The court rejected bail for Ms. Bakhmina and ruled that her detention should continue.

Recently, the People's Court of Hailar District, Hulunbeier City, Inner Mongolia, ruled on the case.

The Court ruled that the issue was controversial and, thus, there is need for legislative involvement.

1980 The longest running court case in U.S. history, the Sioux Nation v. the United States, was ruled upon by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Court ruled that the need for equality also concerns local authorities and their allocation of funds.

The Court ruled that the affidavit of desistance should be considered as hearsay, and had no probative value.

On 26 April 2000, the Appeals Court Prosecutor ruled that there was no reason for lodging an appeal.

A different judge presided over the proceedings and ruled in favour of Waldemar reiterating the reasoning of the District Court.

On 27 April 2005, the court ruled that the prosecutor either had to bring criminal charges or drop the case.

On 2 September 2004, the Central District of Minsk Court ruled to dismiss a motion for release by Mr. Marynich.

It was not until 26 June 1999 that the Constitutional Court ruled that a conviction by an appeal court following an acquittal by the court of first instance did not violate the right to review.

The Israeli High Court had ruled that the construction of the wall within Palestinian territory was justified as a security measure.

The maps were redrawn after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in January that the old districts were unconstitutionally gerrymandered in Republicans' favor.

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that some secret surveillance might be allowed during genuine emergency situations, but this is not unlimited.

A complaint was filed with the Peshawar High Court, which ruled in March 2004 that women cannot be stopped from exercising their political rights.

A Federal court has ruled that the military tribunals system Star Chambers where evidence derived from torture is used against the accused can proceed. Another recently ruled that the president may call anyone anywhere an enemy combatant and detain him or her indefinitely.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has ruled that athletes cannot be banned from Rio on the basis that they have been previously sanctioned.

Last year a special election court ruled the sitting mayor, Lutfur Rahman, should be removed from office following a litany of corrupt and illegal practices.

For example in C.A. 3719 03 Anonymous v. the State of Israel (10.6.04) the Court ruled that 25,000 NIS should be paid to the victim.

The Court also ruled that other treaties, such as the Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights of 1957, were unaffected by the hostilities.

On the contradicting versions of the facts and testimonies of witnesses of the prosecution and the defence, the Court ruled that the issue of credibility of witnesses was an issue under the competence of the trial court.

A Lille court ruled there was no legal basis for expelling the people running the 72 makeshift shops, but said the Calais prefect's concerns were totally understandable.

And in 1921, the Montana Supreme Court ruled in a case involving Prickly Pear that the folks who were there first had the first, or senior water rights.

The Court ruled that under the Adoption Law, each case should be examined on its own merits and all the relevant circumstances need to be taken into consideration.

Both the Turkish Court of Appeals and Constitutional Court had ruled in favour of the ban on head scarves, a decision that had been upheld by the European Court of Human Rights on the grounds that religious symbols contradicted the principles of secularism and democracy enshrined in the Turkish Constitution.

The US Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Argentina was bound to honor its obligations to the holdout bondholders in the same proportion (namely 100 ) as the holders of the exchange bonds. It was that ruling that the Supreme Court recently upheld.

On 10 November, the Regional Trial Court of Laoag City, Branch II (hereafter referred to as the Trial Court) ruled that the petition for bail had been overtaken by the fact that the prosecution was about to terminate the presentation of its evidence .

In a recent example, the Norwegian Supreme Court ruled (8 June 2004) that the provisions of paragraph 6 of the OECD Commentary as changed in 2003 were to be rejected.

On 4 October 1977, the Court ruled for the plaintiff, sentenced the defendants to pay the true value of the works, and decided that the plaintiff should liquidate the debt.

Seven to two, they ruled.

Israel has not complied with the 9 July 2004 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, which ruled that the separation wall constitutes a violation of the resolutions of international legitimacy.

In the case of the promise contained in France's statements, the International Court of Justice ruled, on the basis of those statements, that France should conduct itself in accordance with their content.

On October 16, 2014, Shuyang court made a civil ruling, and ruled that all of the 2,000 farm laying hens shall only be seized and shall not be transferred and sold without permission.

The Québec Court of Appeal ruled that the distinction made between workers who were not social assistance beneficiaries and those participating in the STM was not based on the ground of social condition.

Also, in September 2004, the Supreme Court ruled against publicizing complainants' identities in sex offences, following the conclusive acquittal of the accused (C.A.A 5877 99 Haim Yanos v. The State of Israel (28.09.04)).

Yet on 24 September 1996 the same Court ruled, ex parte and unfairly, that Le Praley should also be wound up The 6 October 1993 judgement was not recorded in writing but existed nonetheless.

They add that they had unsuccessfully attempted to have a meeting with the President of the Republic, and that the Supreme Court of Justice had again ruled that it lacks jurisdiction on their case.

The Court ruled that the need for equality also concerns local councils and their allocation of funds. The Court held that the Ramat HaSharon Council, the Head of the Council, and the Ramat HaSharon Center for Education and Sport are to allocate funds according to the above criteria.

In its Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004, the International Court of Justice had ruled that the wall was illegal, violated humanitarian and human rights law, and undermined the Palestinian people's right to self determination.

The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the program was constitutional, citing a compelling state interest in racial diversity. Effective participation by members of all racial and ethnic groups in the civil life of our nation, the court said, is essential if the dream of one nation, indivisible, is to be realized.

In particular, he refers to a judgement of the Supreme Court used by the judge to underpin her order of 22 January 1996 in this judgement, the Supreme Court ruled that the admission of guilt by an accused through another person is not considered hearsay and is admissible in evidence.

Last month, a federal appeals court in Washington ruled the EPA administrator overstepped his authority in trying to delay implementation of an Obama administration rule requiring oil and gas companies to monitor and reduce methane leaks.

The Court ruled that under the Adoption of Children Law 5741 1981 ( Adoption of Children Law ), each case should be examined on its own merits and all the relevant circumstances need to be taken into consideration.

In November 2003, the Labor Court in Be'er Sheva ruled in favor of a female employee who received a lower salary than her male counterparts (La. 1576 99 Simmy Niddam V. Rally Electricity and Electronics Ltd. (03.11.03)).

In 2001, a lawsuit brought by public interest NGOs resulted in the Indian Supreme Court recognizing the right to food as an aspect of the constitutionally protected right to life. The court ruled that a series of social programs should be expanded, in order to provide a basic nutritional floor for all.