However, we do know that the proposal is not an ideal proposal.

That proposal was widely accepted.

The Chairperson accepted that proposal.

That proposal has major strengths.

His delegation supported that proposal.

That proposal is under consideration.

That is a new proposal.

That proposal raised strong objections.

I'd almost forgotten that proposal.

A motion requiring that no decision be taken on a proposal shall have priority over that proposal.

That is why I made that proposal.

A proposal is considered an amendment to another proposal if it merely adds to, deletes from or revises part of that proposal.

The Chairperson agreed to that proposal.

Several delegations objected to that proposal.

The parties agreed to that proposal.

Unfortunately, that proposal was not accepted.

Mr. BUCH (Germany) supported that proposal.

The Committee agrees with that proposal.

You'd better forget that marriage proposal.

He took it that that proposal was acceptable.

That is why we said that the proposal by the representative of Armenia is a positive proposal that we can work with.

Please also note that, if I heard the Egyptian proposal and the representative of Cuba correctly, the latest proposal was based on the Armenian proposal.

That sounds like a fairly good proposal.

The United Kingdom fully supports that proposal.

Is there any objection to that proposal?

I am consulting you on that proposal.

The author of this proposal notes that

We must give that proposal urgent consideration.

The Ugandan Government had rejected that proposal.

The Working Group adopted that last proposal.

That wasn't a proposal. I'm just curious.

Parts of a proposal shall be voted on separately if a member requests that the proposal be divided.

Parts of a proposal shall be voted on separately if a member requests that the proposal be divided.

Parts of a proposal shall be voted upon separately if a member requests that the proposal be divided.

He took it that the Committee agreed with that proposal.

Additional proposal relating to proposal 3

Distinguished delegates, you have heard the proposal made by the distinguished Ambassador of Australia, who made a proposal which he read out and also proposed that we immediately convene consultations to consider that proposal.

With that revision, the Swiss proposal was adopted.

He said that the proposal had two components.

That practical proposal could be taken into consideration.

My group asks that the proposal be rejected.

The centre asks that the proposal be rejected.

I ask that the proposal be voted on.

Am I to take that as a proposal?

If the proposal to make an amendment is rejected that proposal loses its legal meaning and effect, and along with it, that Parties' notifications that formed the basis for the proposal lose their legal meaning and effect as well.