Moreover, the Regional Court handed down its judgement in open court.

C. The trial and the court judgement

The Tunis court of appeal upheld that judgement.

2.4 Mr. Ostroukhov appealed against the court of first instance judgement to the Moscow City Court, requesting that the judgement be quashed and that the case be dismissed.

The Court must pass judgement on the enemies of humanity.

The appellate court delivered its judgement on 4 February 2005.

2.4 The author appealed the judgement to the Court of Appeal, which affirmed the judgement on 26 June 1997.

The case is Bordini v. Donald J. Trump For President Inc., 16 CS 14300, General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division County of Mecklenburg (Charlotte).

(c) Guarantees the victim a court judgement within a reasonable period

He refers to a judgement of the Supreme Court (R. v.

As a consequence the Supreme Court did not reverse the judgement.

German Constitutional Court, judgement of 24 March 2002, 2 BvR 2175 01.

In a judgement of 9 May 2001, the Constitutional Court rejected the appeal.

The first instance court judgement was delivered on 29 and 30 March 2004.

The judgement was appealed before the Social Chamber of the Madrid High Court, which confirmed the judgement at first instance on 7 April 1998.

By judgement of 16 April 1999, the Oslo City Court rejected the authors' claims.

2.5 On 26 September 1997, the author appealed the judgement to the Supreme Court.

And some states have differential policies, county by county.

Judges Van der Reep and Veger, who rendered judgement in the Court of Appeal case, also sit on the Utrecht Regional Court.

See also the judgement of the Permanent Court in The S.S. Wimbledon, 1923, Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 1.

Moreover, the Supreme Court only made reference to section 101a of the Judiciary Act after it had partially quashed the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 10 April 1992, and referred the case back to the Arnhem Court of Appeal by judgement of 30 November 1993.

It refers to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 17 July 2003, on appeal against the contempt order, and submits that it cannot comment on the merits of any judgement given by a competent Sri Lankan Court.

While this appeal was still pending before the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court handed down a judgement in which it decided that a judge who indicted an accused could not participate in the judgement against the same accused.

On 11 December 1997, the Moscow City Court upheld the judgement of 10 November 1997.

7 European Court of Human Rights, Judgement No. 66289 01, Py v. France (see www.echr.coe.int).

Medium concentrations in or offshore of Pinellas County have been reported in the past week, low to high concentrations offshore of Hillsborough County, background to high concentrations in Manatee County, background to high concentrations in or offshore of Sarasota County, background to medium concentrations in Charlotte County, background to high concentrations in or offshore of Lee County, and low concentrations in Collier County.

2.3 In a judgement dated 27 January 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the application for annulment.

Cyprus v. Turkey, judgement of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 May, 2001, application no.

European Court of Human Rights, Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, judgement of 16 December 1992, Series A, No. 252.

European Court of Human Rights, application No. 56811 00 (Amrollahi v. Denmark), Judgement of 11 July 2002.

In a joint judgement, the full Family Court upheld the appeal and remitted the matter for rehearing.

On 28 November 2003, the Shandong Province People's Court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgement.

She was unable to say whether the Supreme Court had referred to the Convention in its judgement.

The judgement of 4 September 2003 of the Budapest Regional Court (Főrvărosi Bíróság) confirmed the District Court's decision.

2.7 On 4 January 2002, the complainant appealed against this judgement to the Bordeaux Administrative Court of Appeal.

In the present case the same judgement by the Norwegian Supreme Court is being challenged before both bodies.

The Court issued its judgement on 17 December 2002, and both parties accepted it as final and binding.

The author considers that the review by the Supreme Court was limited to formal and legal aspects of the judgement and did not constitute a comprehensive review of the judgement and conviction.

6.5 The Committee notes that the judgements of the s Hertogenbosch District and Appeal Courts, as well as the judgement of the Supreme Court dated 30 November 1993 and the judgement of the Arnhem Court of Appeal, do give reasons for the dismissal of the author's defence.

In its judgement, the Constitutional Court stated that it was not in its remit to review the weighing of the evidence done by the trial court, or to review the conclusions of the Supreme Court.

(Klass and Others v. Germany, European Court of Human Rights, judgement of 6 September 1978, Series A, No. 28).

The Appeal Court struck it down as contrary to public policy in its final judgement of 7 April 1992.

The authors cite Moustaquim v. Belgium (European Court of Human Rights, judgement of 18 February 1991) for this proposition.

According to the judgement of the Constitutional Court, the Court decided that the alleged violation of lack of impartiality of the judges was inadmissible due to the author's failure to raise the issue before the Supreme Court.

5.2 In a letter dated 6 December 2004, the authors state that to date, only the proceedings in the Cascais civil court have given rise to a judgement, namely the ruling by the courts that the authors' right to compensation has lapsed (judgement of the Cascais civil court dated 18 June 2002, upheld by the Appeal Court on 5 May 2003 and by the Supreme Court on 14 May 2004).